Talk:Island country

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Politics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
WikiProject Islands (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

The UK and Indonesia etc.[edit]

In the "Composition" section this article says that some island countries are based around one or two main islands and others have many important islands. Where do you draw the line? The UK has Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Anglesey, the Isle of Man, the Isle of Wight, the Falklands, the Hebrides and the other Scottish islands, even Gibraltar. It all gets very complex and complicated. While in Indonesia the situation is actually very similar to the British: Java, like Great Britain, is by far the most populous island in its country and it's where the capital/ largest city is. Is it just because of geographically large islands like Sumatra and Borneo that this article tries to make a distinction? I see no reason to make a distinction, and suggest that tis section be removed. It's all a scale, anywho.

And also: don't you have to be entirely consisting of islands/ parts of islands to be considered an island country? Wouldn't some even exclude all countries which have land borders?

And: Personally I would qualify Australia as an island country (and NOT because of Tasmania, I'll have you know). Where does one draw the line between island country and continental country? What IS a contineent, really (a large ISLAND!)? Is Malaysia an island country? The Republic of China? The Kingdom of Denmark? Equatorial Guinea? ... Greece? The US? Canada? Spain? Italy? Russia? What matters? Geographical size? Human population? Number of islands? Historical reasons? Public perception? What looks reasonable on a map? : I'm confused, and so should you be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:C440:20:1116:E82F:8659:33F1:2A36 (talk) 12:39, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

The Falklands, Gibraltar and the Isle of Man aren't part of the U.K. The first two are British Overseas Territories and the latter is a Crown dependency. Zacwill16 (talk) 22:14, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

LOL[edit]

This article makes me laugh. It reminds me of one guy grabbing a pen and saying, "Right, this is what I think, and this is how it is. I write therefore I am Right!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.168.91.116 (talk) 21:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Then fix it, or at least be more specific about what's wrong with it. TaintedMustard (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

What DustyStudebaker (talk) 04:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

old[edit]

Well, Australia does have a land mass all to itself and has no land boundaries with other countries... it seems to me that makes it an island country. I was going to edit the article, but I didn't really feel like editing the graphic, so I am settling for making a comment here on the tak page for now. I will add that Australia also includes Tasmania and several smaller islands. We are getting too hung up on what is or is not a continent: suffice it to say (in my opinion) that Australia IS one of the land masses commonly designated as a "continent" and that the country of the same name has that land mass all to itself (along with some islands.)Timothy Horrigan (talk) 20:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)


"Some island nations share their islands with other countries such as Papua New Guinea or the Republic of Ireland."

- by this definition, all countries could be considered island nations... Cogent 20:31, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

No, the definition of an island is "any piece of land smaller than a continent" and most countries are located on continents. - SimonP 20:40, Nov 26, 2004 (UTC)
So the real definition of and island country is "a country which has most of its land not on a continent". Surely the definition of continental land is a matter of opinion (e.g. Australia). I suppose a continent must mean "one of the 3 main landmasses of the world". N4m3 (talk) 20:48, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

The United Kingdom[edit]

How can theldfmjldskfsldgnf, v c,mdfnsdf The United Kingdom is an Island as it has one government, ruling over 3 non-independent countries.

—The preceding [[Wikipedi--201.19.153.158 16:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)a:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by 86.147.66.116 (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC).

The United Kingdom is a group of islands not one island and it also includes Northern Ireland making 4 non-independent countries not 3! YourPTR! 07:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

I know I'm being pedantic here, but the territory of Gibraltar is a part of the UK. Since it is situated on the mainland of a continent doesn't that preclude the UK from being an island state?Gerard von Hebel (talk) 14:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Gibraltar is a self-governing British Overseas Territory the same as, for example, the Falkland Islands or Bermuda. It is not, and never has been, part of the United Kingdom. However, I believe it's citizens' votes in the European parliamentary elections are included in one of the English regions (the Southwest?) - presumably as it is too small to qualify for an MEP in its own right. 62.156.255.22 (talk) 15:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Name change[edit]

This article should be moved to Island states. UN organisations include the Association of Small Island States, for example, and there is also an acronym, SIDS, for Small Island Developing States. There is an important difference between a nation (ethnic or cultural group) and a state (political institution)... The same change for List of island nations and Category:Island nations. Amygdala 09:16, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't it be moved to Island countries? A country is the geographical area according to the article at: state. --24.31.29.171 11:21, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
It should be Island country (singular). If it was "island state" it would include Hawaii, Tasmania etc and I don't believe this is intended. Transcontinental nation was moved to Transcontinental country for exactly the same reason (see Talk:Transcontinental_country#Transcontinental_nation_or_country). Nurg 23:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

coastal states[edit]

Togo has small coast in relation to its land borders, but this is also the case with Benin, Guyana, etc. Togo borders are consequense of colonial policy of a "coast capital + area around it" - as is the case with neighbooring Benin. It is not realy landlocked, it is more like a "coastal nation" (like Belize, Guyana, Suriname - they have bigger inland territories, but don't use them so much). Such coastal states are more similar to island nations. This leads to the question if we should include them in this list also... And remove Togo from paritialy landclocked (its case is much different than Bosnia, Congo, etc.) 199.64.72.252 08:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Landlocked"

I really don't think they can be considered island nations, as they're not on islands, just have a focus on their coastal areas.

Island or All water boundary?[edit]

This article makes it very unclear about whether island nations must have either an all water boundary, or must be confirmed to islands. If the former is true, the UK is not an island nation, if the latter is true, Australia isnt. Which should be true? Jamie|C 18:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Oppose merge[edit]

Haiti and Dominican Republic are island countries, but they are not borderless. Passer-by 06:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, Brunei, the UK, and Ireland also fit this category. They are all confined to Islands, but have some land borders on that island. Fishal 06:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I, too, oppose this merge; not all island nations are borderless, and not all borderless nations are islands (Australia). Jon Harald Søby 19:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
"Borderless country" is quite misleading, and doesn't seem very encylopedic when you consider that regardless of whether there is a land border, many nations do claim waters that border each other. When I did a search back in November (wow, what a long time ago) the current article isn't sourced because (as I've searched) almost all references to "borderless country" appear only on Wikipedia, the two other instances I came across immediately were a fansite about games, and an article talking about a hypothetical "borderless" country "built for peace." Island countries are obvious, they're defined by the fact they are islands. I suggest that the useful information be merged into Island country, and then redirect (or AfD) the "Borderless" article. Radagast83 05:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Greenland[edit]

Greenland is island nation. --201.19.153.158 16:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Nope, Greenland belongs to Denmark, which has land borders with Germany. Jon Harald Søby 19:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Dont be a complete loser (Jon Harald Søby)! Of course Greenland is an Island Nation. It is a "SELF GOVERNED territory of Denmark", hence making it an island nation. I get fed up with people getting so big headed and thinking they know everything and going round being rude to people who say something that they think is wrong, you Jon Harald Søby are one of these bullies. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.109.66.146 (talk) 11:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC).

Taiwan[edit]

Taiwan is an island nation, why isn't it colored in the little picture?--Jerry 00:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I meant the Republic of China.--Jerry 00:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Because the Republic of China laid claim to the Chinese Mainland.70.42.116.9 19:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Taiwan is not a country. It is a province of the Republic of China and the Republic of China is not just Taiwan. Luden 04:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

No, Taiwan is a separate country. Republic of China refers to Taiwan only and People's Republic of China refers to mainland China itself. The two nations have two different national flags, national anthems and government systems. Since its establishment as a nation by the Nationalists, Taiwan has been using its own non-Communist government system and is NEITHER an autonomy nor a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China . So, my point being, as a result, is that Taiwan should be highlighted as an island nation. --Fantastic4boy (talk) 18:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

If it were as simple as "Republic of China refers to Taiwan only and People's Republic of China refers to mainland China itself", this discussion would not be taking place. The problem is that both these countries claim territory which they do not control. The territory claimed by the ROC is far from confined to islands, while the territory controlled by it clearly is. -- Jao (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

For years (maybe since the above discussion in 2008), "Taiwan" was listed in this article as an island nation. Now a user has listed "Republic of China(Taiwan)" (sic) in its place. I reverted this user's edit, and now a third user has reverted mine. I feel "Republic of China" is incorrect because the ROC also claims mainland China as its territory. Only when the ROC's de facto territory of Taiwan and a few other islands is considered does it qualify as an "island nation." Therefore, in the context of a discussion of island nationd, its better to refer to the ROC by its common name, Taiwan. Phlar (talk) 03:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Taiwan-related_topics_notice_board#When_is_using_Taiwan_.2F_ROC_.2F_Chinese_Taipei_appropriate provides some rather good and practical advice on when the rather complicated naming of Taiwan, Republic of China as appropriate. In this case we are talking about the country in particular and not the island which is called Taiwan - even if you ignore the whole claim to be the legitimate government of the whole of China thing The ROC (Taiwan) is bigger ie contains other island than simply the Island of Taiwan. Using ROC is the official name of the country and should at least be included here. Andrewgprout (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
The "advice" you're referring to is one user's summary of how the ROC/Taiwan naming issue has been handled by different parties in different contexts in the real world. How these methods are to be applied to Wikipedia is left open to interpretation. Which "convention" should apply here? That user does close with, "for any non-political related articles, just 'Taiwan' (without really explicitly specifying it as a country or province) is enough already to be used." Phlar (talk) 11:57, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
After reviewing the sources and debates it seems that all references should be "Taiwan" unless there is a specific reason for doing otherwise. Taiwan is the name of both the island and the de facto sovereign state that resides there. Taking the less important Wikipedia_talk:Taiwan-related_topics_notice_board#When_is_using_Taiwan_.2F_ROC_.2F_Chinese_Taipei_appropriate advice, the recommendation that applies here is Universal us (this is not regional nor historic) "Generally, all Taiwan-related articles, it is enough just to name the area as "Taiwan" (it doesn't carry any political meaning).". The use here is not official, nor does it involve PRC. Andrewgprout really needs to explain how he used the advice given to come to his conclusion. His explanation is entirely of his own invention and doesn't seem to relate to the advice whatsoever. More importantly though, this issue has been discussed at length in determining the name of the article of "Taiwan" see Talk:Taiwan/Archive 20. It was decided that the most appropriate title when discussing the "state in East Asia" is the name Taiwan. The name of the article is also the most appropriate name to use when referring to the subject of the article, unless there is specific need to do otherwise, and there is not in this case. Lastly it was fairly clear that in the manner that the edit was changed to include "Republic of China" that there was an element of subterfuge, and indications of making a purely political statement. In short - the country is referred to as "Taiwan" in Wikipedia, the use of any other terms requires specific reasons of context, of which there are none in this article.Jameel the Saluki (talk) 12:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Shared islands[edit]

Island country can fairly clearly refer to countries, such as Ireland, which are located on islands shared with other countries. Why change this article so that it only reflects one definition of the term? - SimonP 13:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Australia[edit]

Why is Australia not highlighted on the map? --124.254.77.148 05:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Australia is a continent Jamie|C 18:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
No, the "Australian continent" is a continent. The Commonwealth of Australia is a country. That's why the "Australian continent" is now scientifically referred to as Oceania. If you don't agree, look up New Zealand, a country, along with dozens more, which shares the Oceanic continent. Hence Oceania is the smallest continent, and Australia is an island country (spread across several islands, like Japan) within it. Hope this makes sense - otherwise, I'll make a Venn Diagram. 211.30.58.23 (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Oceania is not a continent. It is a grouping of countries ( including colonies such as Tahiti and New Caledonia ), most of which are not part of any continent (with the obvious exception of Australia).Eregli bob (talk) 12:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I don't think a Venn diagram is necessary. The problem is not with understanding, but with actual differing terminology: while your system makes sense, it is not in universal use. See Australia (continent)#Geography and nomenclature and Oceania#Interpretative details and controversies. -- Jao (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I acknowledge that there is an issue with terminology. However, to put it totally clearly, without any terminology;
1. there are more than one nations on the said continent (like Japan),
2. the nation shares no island with another nation (like Japan),
3. since no islands are shared (thus removing the nation from "Island Country" status), and since the nation does not occupy the whole continent (thus removing the nation from "Island Country" status), it is thus an "Island country", just like Japan.
I fail to see how Australia (nation) is any different from Japan. Claiming that the Australian nation occupies the entire continent cannot be true, because one would then have to provide an answer for where the neighbouring nations are continentally. Is New Zealand then part of Asia, or America, while Australia is its own continent? :S211.30.58.23 (talk) 09:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
The problem is that there are two concepts, which I personally would like to call "island country" (country with no mainland territory) and "borderless country" (country with no land borders), but which are constantly mixed up here. Japan, of course, is both. Ireland is only the former. Australia is the latter regardless of continentology, but not the former if mainland Australia is considered the mainland of a continent (regardless of whether that continent is called Australia, Australasia, or Oceania). If Australia belongs to Asia, or if it belongs to Oceania and Oceania is considered a mainland-less continent, then Australia is an island country as well as a borderless one. -- Jao (talk) 12:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

The point is that the CoA is situated on what is considered to be the mainland of the continent of Australia or Oceania, whatever you call it. That is what makes it different from Japan.Gerard von Hebel (talk) 14:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Please add a new section about advantages/disadvantages[edit]

Maybe you can add a section about the pros and cons on living in an island country. Dangers, limited amount of space, etc? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.74.70.62 (talk) 10:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

A Single Reference?[edit]

This article doesn't have a single reference on it to support its existence. References please. Wotapalaver (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Island country is not a neologism, 1, 2, 3. --J.Mundo (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Reference 1 above is a reference from 1816 which refers to things like any "island, country, or place". Hardly a reference for island country. This article defines a term. The term has been occasionally used, but so have many terms which are not generally accepted definitions. This article is creating a neologism in the same way as if there were an article "Green and pleasant lands" where any and all places that are green and pleasant were listed. Wotapalaver (talk) 00:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
The definition used in this article is unreferenced. Wotapalaver (talk) 14:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Japan has lots of mountains,rivers, and lakes etc......! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.218.90.81 (talk) 22:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

De facto, not de jure[edit]

It appears that some people here (read above re Greenland and Taiwan) are really picky about the de jure (according to the law, that is) standards for countries. Going by that standard, however, means calling Britain a dictatorship, as according to the law, the Queen is supreme and can dissolve parliament any time she wants. De facto (according to the facts) is the standard we should apply. Thus, both Greenland and Taiwan should be colored as island nations, since according to the facts, they are (despite the ridiculous ceremonial laws that say otherwise). D O N D E groovily Talk to me 02:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I won't get into a debate about the dejure status of government of the UK, I suggest you raise that at the United Kingdom talk page if you really want it to say dictatorship. On topic, I have no idea how you could conflate Greenland and Taiwan, completely different situations. Taiwan, you'll notice, is actually already coloured in on both maps on the page. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 02:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Global warming[edit]

According to

this map

, allot of island countries are vulnerable to climate change; also allot of them seem to be so low that they will be submerged soon,; perhaps a list can be given at this page ?

91.182.144.170 (talk) 14:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

See Alliance of Small Island States / Small Island Developing States with Mohamed Nasheed President the Republic of Maldives getting coverage in recent years (for example in the United Nations and with The Age of Stupid and with 350.org) ... see Current sea level rise, but remember the Earth isn't a smooth sphere, that is spinning, so ocean level changes are not simple. Best wishes. 99.181.134.246 (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
What is this sea of blue in aid of? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Are you 91.182.144.170, Art? 99.181.145.99 (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
You're not supposed to ask, but no. He's promoting a particular image for multiple articles. I've never looked for that image. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:44, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
It appears to be a rhetorical question, Art. 99.112.214.186 (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Percentage[edit]

I changed the line "approximately 25%" to "approximately 24%" since 47 is 24.352% of 193, much closer to 24% than 25%. - Acorn Cat (talk) 03:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Island country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

The “War” section[edit]

Island countries have often been the basis of maritime conquest and historical rivalry between other countries.[2] Island countries are more susceptible to attack by large, continental countries due to their size and dependence on sea and air lines of communication.[3]

That must refer to Caribbean islands. The UK (during WW2), Japan, and Australia are clearly far from this statement and the sea has rather protected them from invasion. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 06:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Island country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Island country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Love/Jacksonville[edit]

On the set of guitar like vast calming contact me. DustyStudebaker (talk) 04:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Reverting to earlier version[edit]

I propose to reincluding these changes into the article. Not sure why its inappropriate, it just mentions a way on how to store excess electrical power produced on the islands (mainly using hydrogen). In my view, hydrogen also seems the most appropriate option as there is the presence of seawater nearby -which can be distilled and then converted to hydrogen using an electrolyser-. The seaweed farming similarly seems a very appropriate solution to islands and island countries.

Any additional objections can be mentioned on this talk page, and hopefully, (some form of) this text can be reintroduced after the objections have been discussed and resolved. Genetics4good (talk) 12:14, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Please be very careful about WP:SYNTHESIS and balance WP:DUE here. Just because things happen on an island does not mean they are specific or important to an island and thus this artice. What you need to provide is references that make a connection between islandness and certain developments or situations. i am unsure that the additions you are suggesting do this. Andrewgprout (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
See https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190327-the-tiny-islands-leading-the-way-in-hydrogen-power
Appearantly, you can easily produce so much power on an island (ie through wind turbines) you can't transport it easily through an electricity line to the mainland (I think because of load balance issues, see article) so that you need to ship the energy in bulk. Batteries don't seem very much suited to store that much power (quite probably an energy density issue) and the shipping industry is already looking at hydrogen as its the cleanest fuel available (currently focus is still on CNG/LNG I think but hydrogen is still cleaner).
Genetics4good (talk) 13:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Regardless of the latter, the article mentioned does at least point out well enough that overproduction of energy is an issue for islands and energy storage is then a merit to the island. So how about we reintegrate that ? And then make another section on energy storage with the other info in ? Let me know or just integrate in article this way yourself.
Genetics4good (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Ok now reintegrated info (current version is now of 16:46, 18 May 2020‎ ), but in a way that explains the issues noted here on the talk page. I hope this is good enough. If not, let me know.
Genetics4good (talk) 16:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
I've reverted. These are WP:RECENTISM, WP:ADVOCACY, and WP:POV problems that border on WP:NOTHERE. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 20:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Did you actually examine the edits I did ? I did so in stages, with the energy storage done at the last part, so reverting everything at once seemed to be excessive. You could have reverted to a version that didn't include the energy storage part, and then again discuss the change here to explain what you didn't like about it. As for the objections you have regarding my writing style:
RECENTISM (inflated or imbalanced focus on recent events). I assume you mean here my focus on the renewable fuels. I somewhat disagree this is such a "recent phenomenon" (development of this has been going on for decades now).
POV & ADVOCACY (promote personal beliefs or agendas at the expense of Wikipedia's goals and core content policies, including verifiability and neutral point of view). Everything I mention is verifiable and accurate. And yes, I focus quite heavily on renewable fuels and such. But then it really is something islands and islands states really are concerned about and with good reason (namely sea level rise). Read Small_Island_Developing_States#Embracing_sustainability , and Effects_of_climate_change_on_island_nations
Genetics4good (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
This is not an issue of verifiability and accuracy. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:46, 23 May 2020 (UTC)