This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KeepZzyzx11(Talk) 16:35, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is an unencyclopedic topic. It doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, probably belongs more likely in a history or medical journal. Charles and Co. 05:40, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Strong keep. Topic is encyclopedic and notable by Wikipedia standards. — PhilWelch 06:20, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Strong Keep Article coveres notable and diverse topic well. More than sufficient amount of content and depth to warrant a stand-alone article. Note that this one has been developing for over a year.Tobycat 06:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Comment there doesn't seem to be a VfD notice on the article page.Tobycat 06:39, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
Then put up a notice, it's a Wiki after all! Fixed :) — PhilWelch 04:58, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.